Birth
Control Pill Raises Breast Cancer Risk for Some
Study
finds younger women with a gene face higher odds of disease
Women
who have one of the breast cancer genes and take oral contraceptives
for five or more years increase their risk of developing early-onset
breast cancer, a new study finds.
Researchers
looked at the history of birth control pill use in 2,600 women who had
mutations in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene, the so-called cancer susceptibility
genes. Half of them had developed breast cancer and half had not.
Increased
Breast Cancer Risk Found Among BRCA1 Carriers Taking Oral Contraceptives
Women
with BRCA1 mutations—but not BRCA 2—who used oral contraceptives
for five or more years had a 33 percent increase in breast cancer risk
compared with BRCA1 carriers who had never used the pill, says study
author Dr. Steven A. Narod, a professor and chairman of breast cancer
research at the University of Toronto. The research appears in a recent
issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Narod's
team also found an elevated risk in those BRCA1 carriers who used the
pill before age 30 and who first used oral contraceptives before 1975,
when typical doses were higher than in more recent formulations. The
longer they used the pill, the higher the risk.
The
average age of diagnosis for the women with BRCA1 gene mutations who
developed breast cancer was 38.6.
Narod
puts the elevated risk in perspective this way: In the general population,
women have a 9 percent lifetime risk of breast cancer. "Women who are
BRCA1 carriers and do not take the pill ever have about a 60 percent
lifetime chance of breast cancer," he says. "Women who are BRCA1 carriers
and do take the pill for five years have an 80 percent chance. That's
my interpretation of our findings."
To
incur the increased risk, he adds, they had to begin taking it before
age 25.
Facing
Tough Decisions About Oral Contraceptive Use
Women
who carry the genes face tough decisions about oral contraceptive use.
Research suggests long-term use of the pill is associated with a modest
increase in the risk of early-onset breast cancer even in the general
population, but oral contraceptives are also found to be protective
against ovarian cancer risk, which has also been found to be elevated
among those with the breast cancer mutation genes.
Other
experts praise the study and say it will give them something solid to
point to when they are asked about the best course of action for BRCA1
and BRCA2 carriers.
"It's
a very large study, and that makes the information more applicable,"
says Monica Alvarado, a certified genetic counselor at the University
of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center in Los Angeles.
The women were recruited from 52 genetic testing centers in 11 countries.
"Prior to this, we were able to tell women [with the gene mutation]
that taking the birth control pill reduces ovarian cancer risk but we
didn't know what it meant for breast cancer risk. All we could say was
there was a suspicion [that it increased risk]."
"We
always have to be careful [about making recommendations] based on one
study," Alvarado says. "But it's the first time we have any real data
from a large study to present to our patients."
Leslie
Bernstein, an epidemiologist and professor of preventive medicine at
the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, calls
the study a critical paper. "It's what we would have predicted based
on other [smaller] studies, including one we did," she says.
"It's
a very well-done study," adds Bernstein, who has studied the association
between physical activity and cancer reduction risk for several years.
Like Alvarado, she is reluctant to make recommendations based on one
study. But she says the new research should provide useful information
to women who have the BRCA1 mutation in making contraceptive and other
life choices.
Always
consult your physician for more information.
HRT
Raises Risk of Lobular Breast Cancer
Study
ID's type of tumor tied to combined therapy
The
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
pulled the plug on a massive study earlier this year after women taking
combined hormone therapy were found to have an increased incidence of
breast cancer.
Now
a new study has identified which type of breast cancer may be associated
with the combined hormone replacement therapy, or that which includes
estrogen and progestin.
Research
appearing in the Dec. 15 issue of the journal Cancer
finds that women on combined hormone therapy are at an increased risk
for lobular breast cancer.
Lobular
and ductal breast cancer are two of the more common forms of breast
cancer. Although lobular carcinoma is less aggressive than ductal, it
has been on the rise since the 1980s. The use of combined hormone replacement
therapy increased during the same time period, leading some to speculate
that it might be responsible for the increase.
"It's
kind of a bad news/good news thing," says Janet Daling, lead author
of the study and a professor of epidemiology at Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center in Seattle. "[Lobular carcinoma] is a little more difficult
to diagnose because you don't pick it up as often on mammograms, but
it has a good prognosis. It appears to be highly related to the continuous
combined hormone therapy."
Hormone
replacement therapy (HRT) is taken by women to relieve symptoms of menopause.
While the hormone estrogen is actually responsible for reducing hot
flashes and vaginal dryness, it also increases the risk of cancer of
the uterine lining. Adding progestin to the mix effectively eliminates
that risk.
This
study, called the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences
(CARE) Study, looked at approximately 4,500 postmenopausal women aged
35 to 64 who had been diagnosed with their first incidence of breast
cancer. They were compared to a control group of postmenopausal women
who had no history of breast cancer.
In
interviews, all of the women were asked to recall information on various
aspects of their medical history, including type of hormone therapy
used, pattern of use, dose, and total duration.
Women
who used combined hormone replacement therapy for six months to five
years were 1.6 times more likely to get lobular carcinoma. Women who
used it for more than five years were twice as likely to be diagnosed
with the cancer, compared with women who never used it.
The
risk was also greater with continuous hormone therapy, or that which
is delivered daily for 25 or more days each month. Women on this type
of hormone replacement therapy for five years or more had a 2.5 times
greater risk of lobular breast cancer. After adjusting for the age at
which menopause began, the increase rose to 3.2 times.
Sequential
combined hormone replacement therapy was associated with a 1.5 times
greater risk for lobular cancer. "There was very little risk with sequential
HRT," Daling says.
A
Word of Caution
Dr.
Clifford Hudis, chief of the breast cancer medicine service at Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, cautions against giving
too much weight to the findings. This latest research was a case-control
study in which women were asked to remember details of their history,
and there was no actual control over the dispensing of the medication.
The gold standard in medical research remains the prospective randomized
trial. "This is the highest standard because presumably bias doesn't
influence who takes or doesn't take the medicine," Hudis says.
The
results of this study apply only to women under the age of 65. Daling
has just finished another study looking at women aged 65 to 79 and,
in this group, sequential HRT seemed to play a larger role.
Estrogen
alone did not appear to affect the risk of breast cancer.
Always
consult your physician for more information.
|
January
2003
Increased
Breast Cancer Risk Found Among BRCA1 Carriers Taking Oral Contraceptives
Facing
Tough Decisions About Oral Contraceptive Use
HRT
Raises Risk of Lobular Breast Cancer
A
Word of Caution
Can
Mammograms Spot Heart Disease?
Online
Resources
Find
a St. John's Mercy Physician
In
Other Breast Health News:
Can
Mammograms Spot Heart Disease?
Mammography
makes headlines as a screening test for breast cancer, but the technology
may do double duty as a predictor of heart disease.
Women
whose mammograms spot calcium deposits in their breast arteries are
more vulnerable to heart attacks and other fallout of cardiovascular
disease than those with clean vessels, new research has found. While
the calcifications in the breast do not harm the heart, they appear
to echo narrowing of the coronary arteries that feed the pump.
"Most
people don't worry about [the deposits] because they're not cancer,"
says Dr. Kirk Doerger, a radiology resident at the Mayo Clinic and
a collaborator on the research. "But now we're finding that they do
have some importance."
In
1998, for example, Dutch physicians found that women with calcified
breast arteries faced a sharply higher risk of cardiovascular death,
especially if they had diabetes. And last year, Israeli scientists
also found the deposits, which increase with age, increased the risk
of cardiovascular disease in women—enough to lead the researchers
to conclude that mammography might be an inexpensive and effective
screening tool for heart and vessel problems.
However,
the latest study cannot make so strong a statement, says Doerger,
who presented the findings in December at the Radiological
Society of North America's annual meeting in Chicago.
Doerger
and his colleagues reviewed medical records of 1,803 women who had
had mammography as well as angiograms to examine their coronary arteries.
They found that after adjusting for a woman's age—which is closely
linked to cardiovascular illness—the presence of breast artery
calcifications on mammograms increased the risk of significantly narrowed
blood flow to the heart by 20 percent.
Smoking
raised that risk by 50 percent, and diabetes drove it up 210 percent,
Doerger says, so the effect is on the modest side. Still, he adds,
"it's free information" that radiologists now ignore.
Each
breast has three main arteries supplying blood. Calcifications on
at least three of those vessels raised the risk of coronary artery
blockage, Doerger says. However, more extensive breast artery lesions
did not magnify that risk, he says.
Turning
mammography into a tool to detect heart disease underscores a common
misperception about women's health. While many women express more
fear of breast cancer than cardiovascular disease, it is the latter
that is more likely to kill them.
Heart
disease kills nearly a half million American women each year, more
than all cancers combined. And nearly two-thirds of women who suddenly
die of heart problems have no previous symptoms.
Still,
Dr. Susan Orel, a radiologist at the University of Pennsylvania School
of Medicine, says she is not sure what to make of the new research.
Since
the women already had signs of artery trouble, the study group was
"very biased" from the start, she says. What's more, "you see [calcification
of the breast vessels] almost all the time in older women," diluting
the potential significance of the marker.
On
the other hand, Orel adds, calcifications on the mammograms of women
in their 30s and 40s stir her concern.
Always
consult your physician for more information.
Online
Resources
John
F. Krey III Cancer Information Center
American
Cancer Society
CA:
A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Journal
of the National Cancer Institute
National
Alliance of Breast Cancer Organizations
National
Breast Cancer Coalition
National
Cancer Institute
Radiological
Society of North America
|